China wholesale-MP4 players,digital cameras,gps system

GPS is the first intellectual property industry who mislead

Recently, the electronic map on the navigation in the first infringement of intellectual property rights, individual media speculation turned days. First published in the media is part of the "China navigation electronic map of intellectual property rights infringement cases in Beijing started the first" of the news reports of the Beijing Wanfang Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "long and Wanfang") to the Beijing's Haidian District People's Court of intellectual property rights Shenzhen City Chambers to prosecute Kay Lide Computer Technologies Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Kay Lide") violations of their "" true-"electronic navigation map" copyright, it is China's first electronic navigation map copyright infringement disputes. Then, there are the media for comments on the length and conduct of the Wanfang counterattack made by confusing right and wrong, black and white is unknown.

First of all, think long and Wanfang in Kenema Lide publicize the latest in a domestic consultancy firm GPS navigation equipment after the electronic map of the area ranked first report - "2006 to the first quarter of 2007 after China installed GPS navigation and electronic map Monitoring software market, "the circumstances under which the first prosecution of Kay Lide.

In fact, as early as the Spring Festival this year, and Fang has long served the indictment of Beijing Haidian District People's Court of intellectual property rights tribunal to prosecute violations of its Kay Lide, "" true-"electronic navigation map" copyright, after Kay GOODLAD During the pleadings in the case of jurisdiction raised objections that the case should be its location to live, that is, the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court. The appeal was rejected Beijing's Haidian District People's Court and the two sides issued a "civil award" ((2007) the Republic of China 8848, the first word). The consultants released a "2006 to the first quarter of 2007 after China installed GPS electronic navigation maps and the software market monitoring" reports of their time in the direction of the 10,000 prosecution after Kay Lide.

It is difficult to understand is, "China's electronic navigation map of intellectual property rights infringement cases in Beijing started the first" news exposure, some people are formally charged with the intentional use of the time difference, news reports big fuss, that the plaintiff's behaviour is typical to attack the industry leader for speculation means. This precisely reflects the defence to confuse the public and its purpose is to the audience will not know the truth of the plaintiff into errors and misleading.

Against a consultancy firms "issued by the 2006 to the first quarter of 2007 after China installed GPS electronic navigation maps and the software market monitoring" As a result, some doubt the author inverted. According to the author learned that the industry management department of each electronic navigation map sales to pay certain costs of encryption plug-ins. According to the results, ranked first by the company should pay the costs in the third row is higher than the company (I believe this is calculated by the students), but the fact is that, from the relevant departments of the data, in the first row of small companies paid only 2,000 sets of navigation encryption plug-in electronic map costs, a figure far lower than the company ranked third. I can not help but ask, is the advisory body of the figures wrong? Or some companies did not pay enough to state the cost? One internal and thought-provoking.

Second, think long and Fang is typical to attack the industry leader for a means of speculation for the following reasons: First, the long Wanfang indictment is outdated software; Second, media reports showed obvious signs of the operation.

"Wanfang long to prosecute is outdated software" as a reason is untenable, this view is typical of the contempt for the copyright act, in the protection of copyright during the outdated one that does not exist. This electronic map and navigation special is composed of the electronic database, each map manufacturers do a version of the map is not to throw away the previous version of the map data once again, but in the last version of the map on the basis of updated. There needs to be pointed out is that "the prosecution of the Wanfang software is outdated" view of his own obscurity has been recognized on the plaintiff to the defendant theft of data, and the defendant's promise to emphasize that no data theft others that is fraught with contradictions, Niutoubuduimazui.

As this is the electronic map navigation industry in the first intellectual property, itself in the industry is a very sensational news. The objective facts objectively, reminding help people distinguish between right and wrong, the media should play a role. I truly want to ask is: will be objective reports distorted through the power of the media to influence the results, what are the motives? Pressure is not trying to push the courts?

Once again, that its geographic information itself is a reflection of the objective facts, let alone who copied whom.

"GIS map is the objective to reflect" the right concept, but "out of the question Who copied whom" this view is totally wrong. First, none of the company say that its map is a map of 100% of the geographic information reflected followed by the various companies on the map geographic information objectively reflect the level is uneven. In other words, the geographical information objectively reflect the percentage of high and low, precisely on the map represent individual company level of the quality of map production. This is like computer software, the computing language by 0,1 two figures through different combination of different combinations produce different software. According to "Who copied who no" to this view, since all computer software are formed by 0,1, computer software piracy problem does not exist. The result of the overwhelming majority of computer software workers will tolerate?

Each mapping is serious conduct site surveys life with a map of the company in return (of course, if it is a copy of the map data to basically do not have a number of costs). In the past, there has always been the eyes of the public "are in the production of the map of China, but also does not exist plagiarism is not a question of copying" Misunderstandings. Some people with ulterior motives who are taking advantage of people's misunderstanding of this concept of confusion, the public did not know the truth again that the plaintiff's behaviour is opportunity speculation, the motive could not be called anything sinister.

What is more, think long and Wanfang act and is the abuse of the right to appeal malicious competitive behaviour.

Such a rule of law in today's society, can use legal means to safeguard their rights vicious competition? Is the copyright infringement of others is not vicious competition?

Some time ago, Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi on the issue of intellectual property rights comrades made an important speech. Encourage business friends, "Do not take 'no Taofan starved to death, not lawsuits Yuansi' stereotypes, we must dare to to a lawsuit, if you have the determination, you have the ability and conclusive evidence, we can win the lawsuit."

Also argued that because the case difficult to determine, there is no separation of winning or losing hope, Switzerland map itself also did not spend any efforts to push forward, the case has been stalled indefinitely.

At present the Chinese government has attached great importance to protection of intellectual property rights, I believe that "this lawsuit is simply no hope of winning or losing separation" point of view is wrong. Vice Premier Wu Yi comrades in the 2007 High-Level Forum on China in the protection of intellectual property rights that the Chinese government attaches great importance to intellectual property rights, the protection of intellectual property rights in recent years will establish national strategies, and made great efforts, and significant progress has been made, mainly reflected in the strengthening of intellectual property rights system, a sound system and mechanisms to protect intellectual property rights, such as three areas. I believe that in order to protect the emerging electronic navigation maps for the healthy development of industries, in certain lawless elements worst violations, the Government must not be tolerated.